Search for: "Jones v. United States Department of Education" Results 41 - 60 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they don’t have the… [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
This is the Iowa cerebral palsy resource guide; this guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by News Desk
Tim Jones, MD Tim Jones is State Epidemiologist for the Tennessee Department of Health, where he directs the Communicable and Environmental Disease services section of the Bureau of Health Services. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
” According the Chronicle of Higher Education, he testified that “[t]his whole business of getting involved in a department’s activities like this is just—it’s caused no end of trouble. [read post]