Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Feb. 20, 2024), our Court of Appeals ruled an indictment for felony obstruction of justice was facially defective for failure to allege an essential element of the offense: the purpose of hindering or impeding a judicial or official proceeding or investigation. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
Croatia (no. 2), criticising the Chamber reasoning that sets ‘a very low standard for the protection of personality rights’. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
Last Wednesday by a 3 to 2 vote the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted long awaited rules to enhance and standardize climate related disclosures, including for the first time requiring greenhouse gas emission disclosures by public companies and in public offerings. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In other words, all the decisions from restitution commissions, judicial courts, and even private settlements[8] should be made public with comprehensive explanations of the solution and the reasoning in order to come to terms with remaining unjust enrichments attributable to the Holocaust. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
It failed due to the narrowness of the Democratic majority in the US Senate and the filibuster rule barrier. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:25 am
As Dave highlighted following the cybersecurity adopting release, the Commission clearly considered the concerns of commenters on many important issues and modified final cyber rules as a result of key comments. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Incumbent federal officeholders cannot receive compensation from campaign funds under the updated rule. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:47 pm
But there shouldn’t be a debate on whether antitrust reform includes basic legal pillars like the right of defense or judicial review, or whether the law ought to unfairly target specific companies with a different legal standard. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
See Camilla Hrdy and Sharon Sandeen, The Trade Secrecy Standard for Patent Prior Art, 70 Am. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
That aligns social ordering with social credit under a socialist rule of law framework through the leadership of the vanguard of leading forces. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:06 am
Central to the Court’s ruling was the requirement for a reasoned statement elucidating the basis for the Council’s decision, encompassing factual determinations, legal conclusions, and compliance with applicable standards. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
Some SEPs significantly impact a standard, while others enhance interoperability or offer minor improvements. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 1:34 am
The Regulation requires the adoption of certain implementing acts by the European Commission, which would mainly set out various technical specifications and requirements. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” Previously, the habits and norms typical of an appellate tribunal had fostered a “norm of acquiesence” that pressed the justices to suppress dissent and rally behind unanimous opinions, but the luxurious discretion available to the justices after 1925 gradually undermined those institutional standards. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
A half-dozen lawsuits have been filed to date challenging the digital-discrimination rules recently approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Also, judicial review of a Mag-Moss rule is far more exacting than under the APA’s [Administrative Procedure Act’s] requirements (the relatively lenient “arbitrary and capricious” standard). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
This may lead to more rapid judicial clarification of the rules, to a great deal of expense and chaos, or all of the above. 3. [read post]
