Search for: "Juice Generation Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 11:55 am
The Board held that nine registrations fell short of the extensive and voluminous use evidence presented in Jack Wolfskin and Juice Generation, where third party registrations and use evidence was used to show that a mark was weak and should be given a narrow scope of protection. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
"Thus, unlike in Juice Generation and Jack Wolfskin, where the third-party evidence involved the very same restaurant services and clothing at issue, here the third-party registration evidence relied upon relates to a broader range of goods, a variety of food and beverage products. *** In addition, the third-party evidence here appears less voluminous than that in Juice Generation, which addressed at least 26 uses or registrations of the same phrase for… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:03 am
” The Board continued by expressly finding that this evidence was “easily distinguishable” from the evidence presented in Juice Generation and Jack Wolfskin. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am
The Board followed the reasoning of the court in Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
Juice Generation, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:02 am
It provided evidence of 27 such uses, and pointed to Juice Generation as the most closely analogous case. [read post]
Precedential No. 27: TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of #WILLPOWER - Hashtag Has No Trademark Significance
22 Aug 2018, 3:36 am
” Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 3:17 am
La Brisa Ince Cream Company, Opposition No. 91252873 [Section 2(d) Opposition to HONEST POP for "Frozen confections, namely, frozen fruit confections and frozen plant-based confections, all excluding frozen yogurt"in view of various HONEST-formative marks for coffee, tea, fruit juice, and other beverages including "juice slushy" products.] [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:36 am
December 16, 2021 - 2 PM: Belay Mortgage Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
Midnight Velvet, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
In Juice Generation there were 26 third-party uses or registrations of marks containing the phrase PEACE AND LOVE, and in Jack Wolfskin, there were 16 paw print designs. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
Cir. 2015), quoting Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:21 am
Am., Inc., 744 F. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:17 am
Cir. 2001)The Board further noted that, to the extent applicant contends that the cited registrations should be treated in the same manner as third-party registrations, these two registrations "do not persuade us that the phrase SOUTHERN GIRL(S) 'has a normally understood and well-recognized descriptive or suggestive meaning, leading to the conclusion that that [term] is relatively weak.'" Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:33 pm
Here are some cases where prosecutors brought criminal charges: In 1998 in what the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak was, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating Federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for selling tainted apple juice that killed a 16-month-old girl and sickened 70 other people in several states in 1996. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:04 pm
" Citing Stix Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:22 am
In re Nino Salvaggio Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc., Serial No. 88138756 (August 18, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis).Disclaimer Requirement: Examining Attorney J. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:32 am
There, the Eastern District of Washington rejected an insurer’s attempt to escape insurance coverage for a Proposition 65 lawsuit filed against juice-maker Tree Top Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:19 pm
Our Botulism lawyers have litigated Botulism cases stemming from outbreaks traced to carrot juice and chili. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
General Mills, Inc., 2007 WL 4762172 (C.D. [read post]
