Search for: "Justice Stuart" Results 41 - 60 of 1,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
The case is being heard today before Judges Carolyn Dineen King, Stuart Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:44 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Attorney District of OregonRon Williams, Health Justice Recovery AllianceAndrew Wilson, TriMetLamar Wise, AFSCME Council 75Jenni York, Neighbors West-Northwest Review BoardHousing and HomelessnessSen. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 11:50 am by JB
Requiring Justices to ride circuit-- i.e., hear cases in the lower federal courts-- has been held constitutional since Stuart v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court has alluded to the market for ideas in First Amendment law for more than a century, dating back at least to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissent in Abrams v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 4:15 am by jonathanturley
The letter also revealed that Associate Dean Tirien Steinbach has been put on leave after her disgraceful condemnation of conservative appellate judge Stuart Duncan. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
In dissent, Chief Justice Donald W. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:29 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Arnold and Stuart-Smith and Lady Justice Falk) Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Astellas Pharma Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 880 (25 July 2023) This was an appeal against the dismissal of the claim by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Teva UK Ltd. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Arnold giving the leading judgment and Lord Justice Stuart-Smith and Lady Justice Falk in agreement. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Stuart Rhodes and the Proud Boys were convicted of seditious conspiracy. [read post]
In March, police minister Stuart Nash was dismissed for disclosing confidential information to political donors. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:04 am by Phil Dixon
The Justice Department has opposed the request on multiple grounds, including that some of the Trump attorneys had not yet applied for such clearance. [read post]