Search for: "Justice v. Director of Revenue" Results 41 - 60 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Amanda Shanor analyzes Monday’s decision in Barr v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
The only hearings listed are the linked appeals of R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Gilham v Ministry of Justice, heard 5-6 Jun 2019. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
[Ferolito v Vultaggio, 99 AD3d 19, 25-26] When a respondent exercises the statutory buyout election, Justice Platkin next observed, “the issue principally becomes one of establishing the fair value of the [corporations]. [read post]