Search for: "Justice v. Rice et al"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
On 26 January 2023, Justice Pepperall ruled on an application by the BBC seeking to have an amendment, which added further claimants to the claim, disallowed on the basis that the claimants were time barred in Nicole Daedone & Ors v BBC [2023] EWHC 106 (KB). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
On 12 October 2022, a statement was read in settlement of Mincione v RCS Media Group. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
NPR, Al Jazeera and CNN cover the claim. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. et al.NJNEWSTeaneck establishing employment discrimination committee? [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Rice: "U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
Canada On 16 January 2023, Justice Sally Gomery dismissed an action in false arrest and defamation in the case of Goble v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Overview of the No-Fly List The ACLU’s lawsuit, Latif et al v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Mr Justice Less said that he was “not going to deny anyone access to (his) courtroom because of their vaccination status. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Rice, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Singh et al 2006 BCSC 1545 involves such a case. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
He provides analysis and insight into the workings of the criminal justice system but, he too, is able to enjoy a moment away from serious criminality. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, Justice Department: Constitution? [read post]
