Search for: "KEYS v. PONDER" Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:56 am by SHG
One of the key aspects to getting older is that you remember stuff. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:57 am by Russ Bensing
Ice had implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Neil ponders the legal protection of voice creations. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Kat friend John William Shaw (Stone King LLP) ponders over the potential outcome of one of the cases if it were heard in the UK. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:46 pm by Julian Ku
Luckily, that noted supporter of international friendship and comity, Justice Antonin Scalia, has come to rescue with his opinion for the Court in Morrison v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgmentNever too late 93 [week ending on Sunday 24 April] - No UK judges in the UPC? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm by Stewart Baker
They also ponder how industry may continue its efforts to narrow the scope of the restrictions and whether Congress will get involved. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
When the Supreme Court debates and then casts its first votes in private on Friday in the case testing the constitutionality of the death penalty for the crime of raping a child, the key points at issue may well be the meaning of a 1977 decision (Coker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
The authors’ job is to make sense of the judicial reasoning and to unpick, for example, the madness of the majority theocratic US Supreme Court’s politicised and reactionary abominations, as in Roe v. [read post]