Search for: "KIMBROUGH V DEFENSE" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  In State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S602aCriminal law -- Conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and powder cocaine -- Sentencing -- Federal guidelines -- Offense level -- Quantity of drugs -- Circuit court of appeals' order requiring petitioners' resentencing based on the district courts' categorical rejection of the 100:1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio and substitution of its own 20:1 ratio conflicts with Kimbrough v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
" As a criminal defense lawyer, I should be thrilled by this. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Kimbrough, Comment, Upon further review: how the NFL’s exclusive licensing agreement with Reebok survives antitrust scrutiny despite the League’s flawed single-entity defense, 13 TULANE JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 235 (2010)Jeffrey F. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Big wins for the accused included the ability of federal judges to depart from the federal sentencing guidelines in crack cocaine cases (Kimbrough and Gall), and of state courts to retroactively apply Supreme Court decisions to criminals seeking post-conviction relief even where federal judges cannot (Danforth).The Court gave wins to both prosecutors and defense attorneys. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am by SHG
Most importantly for Reyes, because Court lacks a Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Regalado, No. 05-5739 Sentence based on guilty plea to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine base is vacated as it is unclear in light of Kimbrough v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Carter, No. 073516 In a conviction for kidnapping and murder, denial of petition for habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) the witnesses to which the undisclosed evidence pertained had already been impeached by the defense; 2) much of the evidence was just as inculpatory as exculpatory; 3) the cumulative effect of the evidence indicated that the undisclosed evidence was not material; and 4) petitioner did not show there was a "reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
  In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]