Search for: "KING v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
See Gideon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
One of the most highly anticipated cases still outstanding is King v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:28 pm
This also reminds me of New Directions for Young Adults, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm
Chris King, No. 105,995 (Leavenworth)Direct appeal; RapeReid T. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:22 pm
Chris King, No. 105,995 (Leavenworth)Direct appeal; RapeReid T. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
King, 131 S. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:03 am
Burger King Corp (Craig Runyon) The Practical Effects of the Ruling in Davis v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Davis. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
Under a line of Delaware cases, a provision that the entity shall indemnify an owner, officer, or director “to the fullest extent permitted by law” provides a right of advancement by implication (Davis v EMSI Holding Co., No. 12854-VCS [Del Ch May 3, 2017]). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
From Murphy v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:23 am
Ct. 2549 (2010) and Maples v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 5:20 am
King, Attorney, Knox CountyMcKinley S. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:30 am
"The New Statesman reviews Juliet Barker's England, Arise: the People, the King, and the Great Revolt of 1381 (Little, Brown). [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:10 am
Nintendo of America Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:08 am
For an example of the most important one, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
Steel Hector & Davis, 2007 US Dist LEXIS 72864, * 33 [NDNY 2007]; see also Nardella v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements (People v… [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
IMS Health, Inc. and Reed v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d at 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385; Davis v. [read post]
