Search for: "KUMAR INDUSTRIES v. US " Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 12:26 pm by The Legal Blog
This same position was reiterated in Subash Kumar Mawani v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
On appeal, Frye and dozens of Federal Circuit cases tell us that an appellant has only the burden of going forward, not the burden of persuasion – on prima facie case issues, the burden of persuasion always stays with the PTO, to a preponderance of evidence.[8] The appellant can meet the burden of going forward by identifying an error in the examiner’s position, either procedural or substantive.If the examiner failed to address an element of the prima facie case, the appellant… [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:12 am by The Legal Blog
Vijay Kumar Sood, AIR 1992 SC 1540; and Oriental Aroma Chemical Industries Limited v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Chauhan and Justice Swatanter Kumar of the Supreme Court recently dealt with the aspect of Directory provisions v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:30 am by Simon Lester
The main legal provisions at issue are: -- GATT Article V:1, V:2, V:3, V:4; V:5, V:7; -- GATT Article X:3; -- TRIPS Agreement Articles 1.1, 2, 28, 31, 41.1, 41.2, 42, 49, 50.3, 50.7, 50.8, 51, 52, 53.1, 53.2, 54, 55,58(b), and 59, and Article 4bis of the Paris Convention of 1967. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by V.Venkatesan
The other categories of citizens, in terms of the Constitutional scheme, are Part III, Part IV, Article 311 and Part V. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by Durga Rao
Before the disputes could be sorted out, Shri Ram Kumar Sharma expired and the 2nd respondent somehow obtained the resignation letter of the 1st petitioner from the wife of late Shri Ram Kumar Sharma and got it accepted by the Board of Directors of the company. [read post]