Search for: "Kagan v. State of Nevada" Results 41 - 60 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Heidi Henson
Previously, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court had ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provisions. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Hyatt — plea to overrule Nevada v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Kevin Russell
Foreman also argued that the provision should not be viewed separately from the other leave provisions, including the family leave provision that the Court in Nevada v. [read post]
(Portal-to-Portal Act), according to the United States Supreme Court, which unanimously decided Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
But we agree with the California court here that hospitals are required to obey state laws giving everyone a right to health care and that decisions about who can receive treatment cannot be made through a religious lens.Controversy 3: The Ministerial Exception: Where Non-believers Are Magically Transformed into “Ministers”Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch joined Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh in expanding the ministerial exception in… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (Justice Elena Kagan took no part in this case.) [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lissa Griffin
Thus, as in states where severance is not up to the parties but is mandatory, such as Nevada or Arkansas, the preclusive effect of the acquittal would not have been waived. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:14 am by Kali Borkoski
On Tuesday, the Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:24 am by Frank Ott
Nevada state prisoner, Christopher Wentzell, pled guilty to solicitation to commit murder, principal to the crime of attempted murder, and principal to the crime of theft. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
See Dobbs, 597 U.S., at ___ (BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., dissenting) (slip op., at 16) (explaining that the Framers “defined rights in general terms to permit future evolution in their scope and meaning”); New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 8:20 am by Lyle Denniston
IMS Health (10-779) — state  power to bar commercial access to and use of private information on doctors’ drug  prescriptions Wednesday, April 27: Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday’s opinion in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]