Search for: "Kahn v. Kahn" Results 41 - 60 of 795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am by jonathanturley
‘In these circumstances, it is for the jury to determine whether an ordinary reader would have understood the article as a factual assertion…’” Kahn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1], 3012-d [9];… [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1], 3012-d [9];… [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 5:09 am by jonathanturley
‘In these circumstances, it is for the jury to determine whether an ordinary reader would have understood the article as a factual assertion…’” Kahn v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by William B. Gould IV
My writings about the third of the above themes did not take form until ‘Organized Labor, the Supreme Court, and Harris v Quinn: Déjà Vu All Over Again? [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The statute of limitations for a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice is three years (see CPLR 214[6]; Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d at 1135), which accrues at the time the malpractice is committed, not when the client discovers it (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Goodman v Weiss, Zarett, Brofman, Sonneklar & Levy, P.C., 199 AD3d 659, 661; Sclafani v Kahn, 169 AD3d 846, 848). [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Then, when the Supreme Court effectively confirmed that CIA black sites were unlawful in 2006 by ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
Sep. 1, 2022)Under the so-called MFW framework, a transaction with a controller is subject to business judgment review, rather than the more exacting entire fairness review, if the transaction satisfies all six procedural protections elaborated in Kahn v. [read post]