Search for: "Kates v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am by SHG
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Kate Brannen and Ryan Goodman, The Official and Unofficial Timeline of Defense Department Actions on January 6, Just Security, (May 11, 2021) 7. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:00 am by CAFE
Few people understand the Supreme Court better than Kate Shaw. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:23 pm by ilpc
Register Today  Kate Fort on: Haaland v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Attorney General William Barr stated in the Wall Street Journal that the belief that ESG factors are material to profitability “appears to rest more on hope than fact. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am by SHG
What Article V of the Constitution does say is that Congress is in charge of proposing amendments that it deems necessary. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]