Search for: "Kats v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 4:39 pm by TWiT
Hosts: Denise Howell and Sarah Pearson The current state and rise of open source, ACLU v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
  So far as the IPKat is concerned, whenever he sees letters like z, v, c and b all hanging around in each other's company, the only game he can think of is the very considerably-protected Scrabble. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
The Kat refers, in particular, to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in The Association of Molecular Pathology & Ors v The USPTO and Myriad Genetics Inc, __ F.3d __ (available here) (CAFC, 2011). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
, as reported by Guest Kat Rosie.Coffee rocks, right? [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
Damage – such as through loss of custom (actual and potential); attraction of custom by the defendant using the claimant’s goodwill; damage to the claimant’s reputation, and hence goodwill, through false association [Stringfellow v McCain [1984] FSR 413].Food for thought… this Kat is interested to hear what readers think would be the likely outcome? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
During the course of clinical trials conducted in the United States some years later, Cephalon noticed that the formulation used by them displayed increased side effects as compared with equivalent doses tested in European clinical trials. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
If it did, then it would be a trap for the unwary in all the 26 other EU member states. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
Question: What do the Kats and the Kappos have in common? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
Indeed, in paragraph 55, the Court states that “the coexistence of earlier marks on the market might reduce the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
In the meantime a big Katpat to Cathal Lane from Tomkins who sent a link to this seminal Irish case on compulsory licensing Allen and Hanburys Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The question of copyright in dance has recently been at the center of attention for the so-called "Fortnite saga" (see Kat Mathilde's, Kat friend John William Shaw and Kat friend Charlotte Waelde posts on this topic here, here and here).Delving into the history of IP litigation in the US we find the case Fuller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
 This Kat believes this was a reasonable and fair approach to take and one which was wholly in the spirit of the new remit of the IPEC. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Aaron Moss
The fact that Jeff Sedlik and Kat Von D are both claiming victory post-Warhol speaks to the still-confused state of the law. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
  Having read the case several times, this Kat thinks it should have had a lot more coverage. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 The case discussed above in the context of recusals -- Resolution Chemicals v Lundbeck -- is one which, this Kat confidently predicts, will make the pages of Scientific American, New Scientist and plenty of other journals where the bright light of patent litigation rarely penetrates. [read post]