Search for: "Katz v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:34 am
The Ontario Court of Justice acquitted Castonguay, but that decision was reversed by the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
” Cesar’s case was heard in the Orange county courts, and this site outlines the juvenile court’s relationship to the Orange County Superior Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
Patino, RI: Superior Court 2012 no. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
Patino, RI: Superior Court 2012 no. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
Legal Times references a lengthy Westat study apparently showing lower reoffending with Superior Court diversion. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
Ariel Katz: can you track when the duty was announced? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
Katz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Phan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Nakhuda v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
In fact, that would probably be a superior to having the courts address it on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
The Supreme Court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion was, therefore, proper. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
