Search for: "Kay v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am
Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v Campbell, Mem. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am
Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v Campbell, Mem. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) was pleased to see that the Volcker Rule as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act will permit banking entities several years to bring their full range of activities into conformance with the new rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court: Original Jurisdiction and Oral Arguments, and Domestic Violence: Resources in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
… After the United States Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The United States, thanks to Alabama, just joined that list. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:03 am
Standing Bear’s case, United States, ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Monday, July 11, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
The courts should take into account agreements such as the MoU and should assume that they would be adhered to, following RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2009) UKHL. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
In their 2009 petition, appellants state that Zargari entered into an agreement with Kay Jewelers for a credit account and that the account is governed by the credit card agreement. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:48 am
Without dissent, the United States Supreme Court has once again summarily reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
United States Law Offices of Mitchell N. [read post]
