Search for: "Kearns v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am by Yvonne Daly
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by Yvonne Daly
Kearns P. noted that there was a “manifest need” for effective measures to regulate the entry into the State of undocumented non-Irish nationals and declined to deem s.12 a disproportionate measure. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm by Buce
" This will, of course, come as a surprise to readers of Doris Kearns Goodwin or Shelby Foote, or David McCullough and their ilk. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:53 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Yesterday’s High Court decision, Doherty v Government of Ireland has resulted in global coverage of the Irish Government’s reluctance to engage with democracy. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Although there is Court of Appeal dicta to the contrary, (Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] EWCA 331.) it is submitted that this is inconsistent with dicta from the House of Lords decision in Jameel (at [54] and [118]) and that the Privy Council decision should be followed. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Enson "UCL Class Certification after In re Tobacco II Cases" by Neal Potischman, Mark Kokanovich and Julie Epley "Kearns v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
”  More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Of course Kearns did not concern publication by a public body, but the judge thought that if there was a contradiction between Kearns and Wood he would be bound to follow Wood. [read post]