Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator"
Results 41 - 60
of 664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
The Austin Court of Appeals has ruled in Texas Railroad Commission et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Kellie Carter Jackson (Michael and Denise Kellen ‘68 Associate Professor of Africana Studies, Wellesley College) “Understanding the Historical Context for White Supremacist Violence in America in Tandem with the Events of January 6, 2021”Expert Statement Katherine Clayton (Ph.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Our review of the determination, which adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who conducted the public hearing, " 'is limited to consideration of whether substantial evidence supports the agency determination' " (Matter of Scheuneman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 147 AD3d 1523, 1524 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Rainer N. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Our review of the determination, which adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who conducted the public hearing, " 'is limited to consideration of whether substantial evidence supports the agency determination' " (Matter of Scheuneman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 147 AD3d 1523, 1524 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Rainer N. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) concluded that the Town discriminated against the complainant with respect to her disability when it refused to accept her medical documentation that she was fit to return to work full time, failed to inform her of the specific language that it would accept in her medical documentation, and eliminated her position when DOOR's budget was adjusted. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) concluded that the Town discriminated against the complainant with respect to her disability when it refused to accept her medical documentation that she was fit to return to work full time, failed to inform her of the specific language that it would accept in her medical documentation, and eliminated her position when DOOR's budget was adjusted. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:03 am
Image from D.A. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 1. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am
J.W.T. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
” Kelly v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Activists have taken to redress the problem by advocating for nugatory “warnings” from remote suppliers, in the face of employer failures to monitor and supervise workers and the workplace, and to provide administrative, engineering, and personal protective controls. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The Associated Press reports here that the lower courts are struggling to apply New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Lidia Kelly reports for Reuters. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Recently the Biden Administration and Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have closely scrutinized private equity’s control over healthcare providers. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
” Kelly Ng reports for BBC News. [read post]
