Search for: "Kelly v. Municipal Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 4:02 am
Seltzer commenced an CPLR Article 78* proceeding in an effort to obtain a court order annulling the determination terminating his employment as a City of Rochester Municipal Parking Coordinator following a disciplinary hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law §75.The Appellate Division dismissed his appeal, commenting that the disciplinary determination was supported by “substantial evidence, i.e., ‘such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
Div. 2000); Kelly v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Kelly, a case the Court took up and then dropped seven years ago. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
Cleary, Indianapolis, IN Attorney for the State, Kelly A. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Kelly because it conflicted with existing state regulations. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:32 am
Kelly, 217 N.J. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm
Div. 2010), A-6218-07, June 22, 2010: Although in 1993 the United States Supreme Court abandoned the general acceptability standard in Frye v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:57 pm
Clarke, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:30 pm
Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523, 538 (1967). [read post]
Did you know that NYC still enforces an anti-loitering law that was struck down nearly 20 years ago?
8 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
Kelly, decided on June 24. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
We handle all NJ Municipal Court cases including DUI in the following NJ Municipal Courts: Hopewell Township, Ewing Township, Trenton, Lawrence Township, Hamilton, Pennington, and other Mercer County, Burlington County, and Camden County, NJ courts. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 7:12 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
For similar reasons as set forth supra, this Court determines that respondents each were or are a public "agency," meaning "any state or municipal department, board, bureau, division, commission, committee, public authority, public corporation, counsel, or other governmental entity performing a governmental or proprietary function for the state or any one or more municipalities thereof" (Public Officers Law § 86 [3]). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Kelly Services, Inc., 2008 WL 2915113, at *13-14 (E.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
When public domain works meet trade mark law: Norwegian Industrial Property Office applies EFTA Court’s judgment and dismisses applications to register Vigeland’s artworks as trademarksA few months ago, IPKat Eleonora Rosati reported on an interesting and important decision issued by the EFTA Court, this being the court with jurisdiction over EFTA states that are parties to the EEA Agreement: Case E-5/16 – appeal from the municipality of… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
See, e.g., Kelly, supra, 97 N.J. at 196-97; State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Daniel Walfish discusses the impact of the court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
