Search for: "Kennedy Holding Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2018, 7:05 am
Wayfair, the Court overturned Quill Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Amgen was argued on the same day as Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:36 pm
Jevic Holding Corp., potentially the most important of the Supreme Court’s recent bankruptcy cases, the court appears to be on the verge of rejecting priority-skipping structured dismissals as a means of resolving Chapter 11 cases. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Back in September, we reported on the Sixth Circuit’s high-profile decision in Autocam Corp., et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Back in September, we reported on the Sixth Circuit’s high-profile decision in Autocam Corp., et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:05 pm
[3] Id. at 782 (Kennedy, J. concurring). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
New York State Urban Development Corp. and the Empire State Development Corp. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
EPA, in which Kennedy joined the liberal wing in holding that the agency had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
” Justice Sharon Kennedy. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
In holding that the State of North Dakota would likely succeed, the Court found that EPA went beyond the test articulated by Justice Kennedy in the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos when developing the rule: The Rule allows EPA regulation of waters that do not bear any effect on the “chemical, physical, and biological integrity” of any navigable-in-fact water. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
., et al. and Stryker Corp. et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
And in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Safety-Kleen Corp, 61 Ohio St.3d 624 (1991) (When an employee seeks damages resulting from an act or omission committed by the employer with the intent to injure, the claim arises outside of the employment relationship, and the workers’ compensation system does not preempt the employee’s cause of action.) [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
Manhattan Community Access Corp., decided on February 9. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
” In Jesner, Kennedy endeavors to provide just that. [read post]
