Search for: "Kennedy v. England"
Results 41 - 60
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
Saheid v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
Briefly: In Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Buck v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
Kennedy’s talk addressed a variety of topics, including Scalia, selfies, civics, and the musical “Hamilton. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am
” Commentary on the Court’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
” Briefly: At The New England Law Review’s On Remand, Lawrence Friedman weighs in on the Court’s recent decision in Utah v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
Kennedy, 253 F.3d 12 (Feb. 13, 2001), rehearing denied 265 F.3d 1072 (Oct. 2, 2001): The court ruled against evangelical Christians who claimed a National Park Service regulation prohibiting the sale of t-shirts on the National Mall violated RFRA and the equal protection clause.Levitan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
I disagreed with his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
There is a closely related United Kingdom case which has been communicated, Times Newspapers Limited and Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
Rory Little previewed Mussachio v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP (Scotland), heard 19 October 2015. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19] Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
” Roberts announces that Justice Kennedy has the Court’s opinion this morning in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
Twenty years before Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
In Armstrong v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
I wrote about Justice Kennedy’s opinion on Monday, and wrote about Justice Alito’s concurring opinion on Tuesday. [read post]
