Search for: "Kennedy v. Social Security Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am by Colin Miller
Daniel Kennedy, Professor Emeritus at the University of Detroit, where he taught criminology and security administration for over thirty years. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
Recognizing the fecklessness of Trump’s barbs should give courts pause before elevating his social media over actual policy statements. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
 Do you agree that, as Justice Kennedy has written for the court, “[t]he ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives”? [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Andrew Koppelman
- elderly retirees who do not have the Social Security benefits they would have received if their spouse were of the opposite sex [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had an article “Apple Users Warned About iOS13 Security And Privacy Problem”. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm by Charles Miller
In 2000, Flores provided the steel plant with a false name and false Social Security number. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  These intellectuals treat marriage equality for LGBTQ+ persons as an admirable social movement and Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Moreover, to judge from the lengths he has gone to reach out for issues and keep them alive when he is in a minority,[20] he would work to secure certiorari—which requires only four votes—in cases that Justice Kennedy would not have favored. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am by Carlos Ball - Guest
It would seem that Justice Kennedy, given his prior opinions in Romer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
”  Finally, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes “unmistakable comparisons to the court’s action on the Social Security Act of 1935” (which the Court upheld in a pair of cases in 1937). [read post]