Search for: "Kennedy v. Thomas et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The Commission is a body created under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Act), as amended, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq. (1982 ed., Supp. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
The cases were Burrage v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
” – but the one power he thought necessary to prevent disunion, the federal veto, was repeatedly and definitively rejected.[5]Eleven days before the Convention adjourned, Madison complained to Thomas Jefferson, in Paris at the time, that because his proposal for a federal negative of state legislation had been turned down, “the plan should it be adopted will neither effectually answer its national object nor prevent … local mischiefs. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
Bay Mills Indian Community et al., Case No. 12-515 (May 27, 2014). [2] See Slip op. at 4-6. [3] Id. at 5, 7. [4] Defined in IGRA at 25 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Today the Supreme Court made an effort to clarify that line in AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ET AL. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Ball State University Et Al. (570 U. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
The full decision is located here, but the holding is below.http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_8njq.pdf ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY ET AL. v.MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
AMP v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Kennedy et al FLSD Other Civil Rights Americans with Disabilities Act Boehm et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
I was likely not alone as the interest over National Federation of Independent Business, et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:13 am
Yesterday’s decision of the US Supreme Court in NFIB et al v Sebelius regarding the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”, aka Obamacare), which has convulsed the American political scene, usefully illustrates the important differences between the US Court and its UK equivalent. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
In all five Justices rejected the argument that the individual mandate of the ACA would pass Constitutional muster under the Commerce Clause, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court rules on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
Christopher et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
The current Court is made up of six Roman Catholics (Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor) and three Jews (Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan). [read post]
