Search for: "Kimbrough v. Kimbrough"
Results 41 - 60
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
” Williams v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
“Kimbrough opened the door for policy disagreements with the Guidelines and Welton closed it only to preclude arguments based on crack/powder disparities when those challenges stemmed from the [...] [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Kimbrough Constr. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:28 pm
" The circuit agreed with the defendant's argument that this was incorrect; under Kimbrough "a Guidelines sentence can create an unwarranted disparity. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
The Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court's decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:20 pm
The United States Supreme Court even ruled in Kimbrough v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:25 am
Because the defendant was sentenced before Kimbrough v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
Dillon v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
Like the crack guideline at issue in Kimbrough, the child pornography guideline yields harsh and iniquitous results, not because of any empirical analysis, but solely as a result of Congressional directives. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:42 pm
Sure, some of you were confused the first time that the Supreme Court said you don't have to adhere to the sentencing disparity in their 2007 Kimbrough v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:57 pm
McCann (Vermont Law School) has posted “American Needle v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:10 am
Co. v Kimbrough, 116 AD2d 692, 692; see Nassau Ins. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 01, 2009 US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
The Seventh Circuit today has an interesting panel opinion in US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
Joining the First Circuit and adding to the circuit split on this issue, the Third Circuit has held that, under the logic of Kimbrough v. [read post]
