Search for: "Kind v. Clark" Results 41 - 60 of 489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
" In the Seventh Circuit, Jones v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:23 pm by David Gabor
Clarke Checks, Inc., 711 F.2d 966, 980 (11th Cir. 1983). [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:51 pm
From the industrious and observant Birgit Clark comes news of an interesting decision from Germany in the field of personality/privacy rights v freedom of art. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:14 pm
In reasons for judgment published today on the BC Supreme Court website (Patoma v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Jodie Liu
Closing, Clarke implored jurors to hold their minds and hearts open. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Isabel McArdle
G v E and others [2010] EWCA Civ 822 – Read judgment This post was written with the kind help of Jaime Lindsey The Court of Appeal has held that a person who lacks mental capacity can be detained if the Court of Protection considers that it is in their best interests, without having to meet additional conditions under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
A (Appellant) v Essex County Council & National Autistic Society (Intervener) [2010] UKSC 33 Supreme Court (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke) July 14 2010 The right to education under Article 2 Protocol 1 of the Convention was not breached by the delay in catering for the special educational needs of a child. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]