Search for: "King Arthur Estates"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2008, 10:00 am
After usurping the throne, the evil King Miraz now rules over Narnia instead of its rightful heir, Miraz’s nephew Prince Caspian, who lives in exile. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:28 am
Background Since around 1988, Henry Camuso and Arthur Gallinaro were 50/50 general and limited partners in Regent Associates, a real estate limited partnership that owns nine Brooklyn residential apartment buildings. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
” An alternative site (the “Westlands CREZ site”) suggested as appropriate by Appellants was located approximately 60 miles away and in 2 different counties (Fresno and Kings); it was also encumbered by numerous Williamson Act contracts, the majority of it was held by a private investment group (Westside Holdings), and Solargen had previously approached Westside Holdings about potential use of the site but failed to come to an arrangement. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
” (Citing King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:34 am
Wiand of Wiand Guerra King of Tampa, Fla., was appointed receiver in 2009 to try to recover funds from indicted Sarasota hedge fund manager Arthur Nadel. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
In a published decision filed March 30, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) reversed a trial court judgment upholding the reissued final environmental impact report (“RFEIR”) for a 44-single family residence project on a unique, species- and habitat- rich 32-acre site in the City of Livermore’s Garaventa Hills area. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In an opinion filed on December 16, 2021, and belatedly ordered published on January 13, 2022, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected a CEQA challenge to a small multifamily project in the City of Santa Cruz. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
Rehearing Denied and Opinion Modified In Kern County Ministerial Oil And Gas Well Permitting Ordinance EIR Case On March 20, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal filed an Order modifying its Opinion and denying the requests for rehearing of respondents (Kern County) and real parties (WSPA and CIPA) in King and Gardner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
In affirming, the Court reaffirmed and followed Supreme Court precedent “ma[king] clear that the filing of a facially valid notice [of determination or notice of exemption] starts the running of the statute of limitations, even where the underlying CEQA determinations may be flawed. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
While Kings County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
KING, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
In a 74-page opinion filed February 24, and later ordered published on March 17, 2020, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 7) affirmed judgments (granting the writ petition and awarding fees) in coordinated appeals stemming from a CEQA action successfully challenging the City of Agoura Hills’ (City) project approvals and mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a mixed use development project on an undeveloped 8.2 acre parcel. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
From my 1990 Stone Soup article in Real Estate Review Among the properties we had to tackle was King Arthur Apartments, whose financial statements made absolutely no sense to us, so the two of us flew to Dayton to visit the property. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
In that case, Kings County Supreme Court Judge Arthur M. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In 1916, a man named Arthur Looff built a pleasure pier parallel to and wider than Santa Monica’s skinny municipal pier. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
In an opinion filed January 28, and later certified for publication on February 16, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate that challenged on CEQA grounds the El Dorado Irrigation District’s (“EID”) decision to undertake its Upper Main Ditch piping project. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
In an opinion filed on December 29, 2021, and later ordered published on January 25, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed a judgment upholding the City of Newark’s (City) use of Government Code § 65457’s CEQA exemption for a 469-lot residential subdivision on land adjacent to San Francisco Bay. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) USPTO news: E-Commerce alert – tips to improve your e-filing effectiveness (Patent Docs) IP protection in the US fashion industry (IP Osgoode) (IP Osgoode) US General – Decisions California Supreme Court reaffirms strong public policy against covenants not to compete: Edwards… [read post]
