Search for: "King v. Baker" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2007, 1:36 am
Free Speech Coalition) and King (concurring with Judge Baker that Judge Crawford's opinion on waiver of confinement credit was wrong). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
There is more coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Indeed most IP litigators practicing in the UK have never had the pleasure of navigating what is now the King's Bench Division (KBD), spending most of their life in the comparatively modern Chancery Division. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:30 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
The New Orleans school desegregation case, Bush v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:02 am by Bridget Crawford
Among the new members are these academics: CaliforniaColleen V. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Frankfurter no doubt contributed to this change in Baker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
"The plaintiff failed to allege any facts from which malice could be inferred and [her] conclusory allegations of malice were insufficient to overcome the privilege" (Red Cap Valet v Hotel Nikko [USA], 273 AD2d 289, 290; see Rohrlich v Consolidated Bus Tr., Inc., 15 AD3d at 562; Serratore v American Port Servs., 293 AD2d 464; Freidman v Ergin, 110 AD2d 620, affd 66 NY2d 645; see also Breytman v Olinville Realty, LLC, 54 AD3d 703, 704;… [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
On due consideration of plaintiffs' complaint in light of the parties' appellate arguments, we affirm the district court's judgment that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 07a0342p.06 2007/08/28 Operation Kings v. [read post]