Search for: "King v. Texas" Results 41 - 60 of 847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What they wanted was freedom from parliamentary control—the “sovereignty” of the “King in Parliament”—and genuine self-government. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Federal theory in the twentieth century is first developed by institutionalist political scientists, such as Kenneth Wheare, who took the American federation as a lodestar.[8] Thus, the result of Texas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:50 am by Kevin
These lawsuits are typically not at all interesting, but I might make an exception for Steven King d/b/a If Love Is a Drug … God is Dope v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Harvard, "established by the state" means "established by the federal government" in King v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]