Search for: "King v. United States Government CASE TRANSFERRED"
Results 41 - 60
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Common law has been “frozen” and the power to recognize new rights and obligations increasingly transferred to the apparatus of government, usually but not always its legislature. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
King -- new attempt to persuade the Court to review state power to bar the distribution of sexual devices; case was previously denied in February 2005. 06-1540, Mallinckrodt v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
Paragraph 19 of the agreement contains a choice of law provision, which provides that ‘‘this agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be determined, governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the state of California without regard to conflicts of laws principles. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
The government asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether a final judgment in favor of the United States in a lawsuit brought under the FTCA, on the ground that a private individual could not be held liable in the same circumstances, bars a claim against a government employee based on Bivens v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
On December 8, the U.S. federal government agency decided to sue for the sake of suing, meaning that neither was there a need (given the acquirer's willingness to address any potential concerns) nor a case (investors certainly weren't impressed). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
18 USC §3509(m) Constitutional; Defense Counsel Can Examine Computer Drive at Government Office
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court in Quality King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:26 am
The Supreme Court in Quality King v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, recently recognized this governing principle in an analogous case, Payne v. [read post]
