Search for: "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., during which multiple justices discussed amicus briefs from the European Commission, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:04 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct 1659 (2013), the Court faced the question of whether the ATS permits a claim based on “conduct occurring in the territory of a foreign sovereign. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:16 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al. : Présumption contre l’extraterritorialité nationale en matière de violations du droit internationalContentieux International GénéralH. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
This conclusion is consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kiobel v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:52 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., and Bond v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013), another corporate complicity case involving the extractive industries in Nigeria. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013) [10] Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari; Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid; Salah Hasan Nusaif Al-Ejaili; Asa’ad Hamza Hanfoosh Al Zuba’e v CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., is an example. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., which effectively invalidated Chowdhury’s ATS legal theory. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. barred this claim because it was an extraterritorial application of federal law against them. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
In addition to Ecuador, the resolution was co-sponsored by Bolivia, Cuba, South Africa, and Venezuela. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Federal Communications Commission 13-1124Issue: (1) Whether the Court should overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum), treaty self-execution and executive pre-emption (Medellin v. [read post]
