Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am
On February 13, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold the appellate hearing in FTC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Led by Harold Koh of Yale and Michael Ratner of CCR, clinical law students and lawyers worked with immigration officials to secure entry to the United States for clients whom the United States had detained, including some clients who had serious health needs such as HIV-positive status. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:54 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Avanci, Nokia et al.'s motion to transfer Continental's U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:53 pm
QualcommFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsAntitrust think tanks urge Ninth Circuit to affirm Judge Koh's FTC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
This is already the fifth post on some amicus curiae briefs filed with the Ninth Circuit in support of the Federal Trade Commission's answer to Qualcomm's appeal--and it won't be the last with at least a couple of submissions from the automotive industry still in my editorial queue.These are the previous posts on amicus briefs supporting the FTC:40 law and economics professors supporting FTC against Qualcomm's appeal contradict themselves just two pages apartAntitrust think tanks… [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
As the great Rush Limbaugh said a few years ago:"George Soros' objective is to agitate and vibrate the United States into a crumbling state of disrepair. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:41 am
FTC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Int'l v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:51 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had not resolved the issue on a definitive basis: Continental could refile. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
Koh of the United States District Court denied automotive supplier Continental's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Avanci patent pool firm and several of its members (Nokia, Sharp, Conversant, Optis). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against… [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to provide guidance (this post continues below the document):19-09-06 Sharp Letter Re. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:15 am
Koh in today's partial withdrawal of the U.S. antisuit injunction motion (this post continues below the document):19-09-03 Partial Withdrawal... by Florian Mueller on ScribdContinental's filing states that they are now opposing this injunction in Munich. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
