Search for: "Koppel v. Koppel" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Skilling was the third case the Court has agreed to hear involving honest services fraud, as Nathan Koppel at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog notes:   the Court will also hear oral argument this Term in Black v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:14 am by Allison Tussey
IRVING RUBIN, DESIREE RUBIN, ABRAHAM RUBIN, JACOB RUBIN, SAMUEL RUBIN, JOEL RUBIN, RIVKY RUBIN, RACHEL RUBIN, JOEL KOPPEL, RIFKA RUBIN, and BENZION KRAUSE, the defendants, were borrowers who fraudulently obtained loans from banks and other lenders. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
”  And at the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin, Nathan Koppel and Ashby Jones examine Kagan’s record, highlighting her views on presidential authority and her stance on gays in the military. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
  Nathan Koppel at the WSJ Law Blog has this commentary. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
  Nathan Koppel of the WSJ Law Blog reports on the eventual resolution of the military recruiting controversy at the law school. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am by James Bickford
Bollinger and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:47 am
In a post on client relationships titled Don’t Treat All Your Clients The Same, Michelle Golden writes that it’s okay to calibrate our service offerings to the type of client we’re engaging (very best v. good v. base line). [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm by Lovechilde
  This should be treated like Ted Koppel-style hostage crisis reporting (e.g., "This is Day 57 of the Republicans failure to hold confirmation hearings"). [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Steve Hall
David Oshinsky, the Pulitzer Prize-winning UT historian, is the author of Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]