Search for: "L. T. Jackson" Results 41 - 60 of 842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 3:33 pm by Amy L. Peck
This includes: Spouses of U.S. citizens or children of such spouses (K-3 or K-4 nonimmigrants); Victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons (T-1 nonimmigrants); Spouses of principal E nonimmigrants; Spouses of principal L-1 nonimmigrants; and Victims of qualifying criminal activity (U-1 nonimmigrants) and certain qualifying family members (U-2, U-3, U-4, and U-5 nonimmigrants). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is a “very uncertain time” for clients, said Ryan Carney, a government affairs advisor at K&L Gates. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which it eliminated the federal constitutional right to seek an abortion. [read post]
(It doesn’t even have to be written on paper—trusts and estates lore is full of stories about wills that were written on walls, carved into tractor fenders, and even tattooed on a person. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 7:57 am by Unknown
In recent years the SEC has had three chairs who identified as Independent: Mary L. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was moderated by Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Stanford Center for Racial Justice, along with the following Stanford Law faculty panelists: Easha Anand, Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Richard Thompson Ford, George E. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am by Gene Takagi
In a subsequent tweet, Bradach points to this article in SSIR: Selling Social Change] Equity and Justice: “A Tragedy for Us All”: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Dissent (The Nation) Sotomayor says Supreme Court ruling condemns LGBTQ people to ‘second-class status’ (Michael Mitsanas, NBC News) Opinion: For Most College Students, Affirmative Action Was Never Enough (Richard Arum and Mitchell L. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Well, Hansen wouldn't be that "appropriate case," but a majority of the Court seems to share Justice Thomas's doubts. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
" … [T]he trial court erred in taking judicial notice of the truth of the statements in the documents the City asked the court to judicially notice. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The theory itself isn't the basis for the Roy Cohn/Louis XIV (l'état, c'est moi) view of executive power.(3) HypocrisyDespite its problematic framing, the Times story does point to the fundamental hypocrisy of the Trumpists: "They are condemning Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]