Search for: "L.P." Results 41 - 60 of 4,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One of the hallmarks of PCCE is that it brings together academics, regulators, and industry professionals, and allows us to have candid conversations about corporate misconduct and the ways in which we can all work together to improve compliance. [read post]
Kennedy The post Thought of the Day appeared first on The Mendel Law Firm, L.P.. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:29 am by Unknown
Moab Partners, L.P., the Supreme Court clarified that private securities fraud actions may not use “pure omissions” as the basis for certain securities fraud claims without a misleading statement.The decision narrows potential liability for private securities fraud claims under Exchange Act Rule 10b-5(b) or Item 303 of Regulation S-K.While consumer advocates argued that limiting claims in this way will keep important information from investors, business groups said that allowing… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Cedar Fair L.P., et al., Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-01843-JGC) in U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am by Unknown
Moab Partners, L.P., April 12, 2024, Sotomayor, S.).The Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Second Circuit’s judgment, which found that the respondent investors could bring a private securities fraud claim based on failure to make disclosures under Item 303 “trends and uncertainties” provisions.The ruling resolves a circuit split. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
Moab Partners, L.P., a case from the Second Circuit addressing the ability to rely on a failure to disclose certain information in accordance with the requirements of Item 303 of Regulation S-K as a basis to state a securities fraud claim under SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Lyle Roberts
Moab Partners, L.P. holding that the failure to disclose information required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K can support a Rule 10b-5(b) claim only if the omission renders affirmative statements misleading. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Varco, L.P., 668 F.3d 262 (5th Cir. 2012), interpreted state trade secret law and explained that: “Damages in misappropriation cases can take several forms: the value that a reasonably prudent investor would have paid for the trade secret; the development costs the defendant avoided incurring through the misappropriation; and a reasonable royalty. [read post]
” -Zig Ziglar The post Thought of the Day appeared first on The Mendel Law Firm, L.P.. [read post]
Tolkien The post Thought of the Day appeared first on The Mendel Law Firm, L.P.. [read post]