Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 3:58 am
Here is additional analysis by Nicole Zanardi, a student at UC Davis School of Law: Dimaya v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:20 pm
They do not invoke the Fourteenth Amendment in so many words but, as I read it, they are alleging that the use of the altered forms violates their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment in two respects:(i) First, although the plaintiffs do not argue that a marriage performed pursuant to such a license would be invalid under Kentucky law (to the contrary--see the quotation from Pinkhasov v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The other interesting holding of Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The post U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The post U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:08 pm
Second, it's doubtful that a federal court has jurisdiction to resolve Davis's state-law RFRA claim against the Governor -- she should have brought it in state court. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:04 pm
Greene and Davis v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
The Court of Appeal for Ontario's April 14 ruling in Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:01 am
In Kenny v Davis, Not Reported in Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:10 pm
Here’s a quick overview: Davis means that the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:42 am
Greene and Davis v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Davis, Case No. 282994, holding that People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 7:55 am
The Davis opinion left many questions unanswered, even within the realm of statements made shortly after a crime to law enforcement officials. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:33 pm
Davis case. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:59 am
In the case Karen Atala and Daughters v Chile, Professor Davis co-authored the amicus curiae brief arguing that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes under international law. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:59 am
Case Citation: Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm
Brownstein (University of California, Davis - School of Law and University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted Afterthoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
