Search for: "LEE V. MARTINEZ"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
Lee v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
” Martinez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
” Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
Carpenter, 15-1193, on its third relist, asks whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion based on Martinez v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Lee, 15-789, fourth relist, is a state-on-top habeas case hailing from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
In 2013, Johnson filed a motion asking the district court to reconsider its previous dismissal based on Martinez v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:42 am
The case, 8-1 per Justice Sotomayor, is Hurst v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:01 pm
Superior Court (Lee) (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 718 (discussed here) the Court of Appeal held that the IWC Wage Order definition of "employer" -- discussed in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
AND E.C., AND ROSA SILVIA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 13-0158 You might remember FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States, 13-983, and Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Our lone new relist is Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:07 am
Martinez, 122 F.3d 421 (7th Cir. 1997), and United States v. [read post]
