Search for: "LILLY v. WYETH" Results 41 - 60 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Kelly
(Afro-IP) Africa: Giving consumers power in the battle against counterfeits (Afro-IP) Australia: Review Four Corners’ ‘Body Corporate’ program on gene patenting (Patentology) India: Roche and Novartis, finally, manage to defend their patents in oppositions filed by Cipla (Spicy IP) South Africa: San people push for new legislation – demand protection for indigenous knowledge and IP including medicinal remedies derived from plants including Hoodia (Afro-IP) US: PHOSITA:… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’:… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’:… [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In its statement of answer, Wyeth indicated that it would primarily rely on its second auxiliary request, and would not defend the claims as granted. [read post]
The judge reviewed the national case law on selections/deletions from multiple lists (Merck v Shionogi [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), Nokia v IPCom [2012] EWCA Civ 567 and GlaxoSmithKline v Wyeth [2016] EWHC 1045 (Pat)) and the EPO cases reviewed therein and in the EPO Case Law Book. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1999 WL 33548540, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:33 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: US: FTC alleges companies were asleep at the wheel when they failed to report settlement agreements on Ambien CR; Commission uses the opportunity to provide industry guidance – and a warning (FDA Law Blog) (GenericsWeb) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – US: Certiorari denied in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
 This was Andrew’s characterisation of the riddle faced by Birss J in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:14 am
(Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: AMP v USPTO after Bilski v Kappos (Patent Docs) US: NORD Chair/HP&M Director presents opening testimony at first ever FDA orphan drug hearing (FDA Law Blog) US: Celsis files patent infringement complaint against CellzDirect and Invitrogen over pooled multi-cryopreserved hepatocyte products (Patent Docs)   Products Astelin (Azelastine) – US: Zydus admits infringing Meda’s Astelin patent, agrees not to market… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm by Duncan
(Patent Docs) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: AMP v USPTO after Bilski v Kappos (Patent Docs) US: NORD Chair/HP&M Director presents opening testimony at first ever FDA orphan drug hearing (FDA Law Blog) US: Celsis files patent infringement complaint against CellzDirect and Invitrogen over pooled multi-cryopreserved hepatocyte products (Patent Docs)   Products Astelin (Azelastine) – US: Zydus admits infringing Meda’s Astelin patent, agrees not to market… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:58 pm
Solstice International Partners et al (Docket Report) US: FTC annual report highlights the Commission’s patent settlement efforts (FDA Law Blog)   Products Adcirca (Tadalafil) – US: Declaratory judgement of non-infringement and invalidity based on ANDA to manufacture generic Adcirca: Synthon v Eli Lilly et al (Patent Docs) Amrix (Cyclobenzaprine) – US: Mylan seeks declaratory judgment of noninfringement, unenforceability and invalidity of Amrix patent, based… [read post]