Search for: "LJS CO. v. Marks" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
The winner: Cat(therine) Slater (Serjeants) suggests that “the successful IP lawyer will be wearing a new perfume/aftershave soon to launch with a marketing campaign devised by Lord Justice Jacob: “L’Oréal … beyond the wildest dreams of the poor” [If this allusion needs explanation, see Jacob LJ's comments in L’Oréal v Bellure, noted here by the IPKat]”. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Just in time for Murdoch’s visit, Tom Watson MP has released his new book, co-written with journalist Martin Hickman, Dial M for Murdoch. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Mark Zuckerberg has been added as a Defendant in a lawsuit against Facebook over consumer privacy violations related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) dismissed the application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am by Durga Rao
We have been seeing some advancements in the Law of Arbitration in India and the land-mark Supreme Court Judgment making it very clear that the Chief Justice under section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 exercises judicial functions, has further dealt-with the issue as to when a matter can be referred to Arbitration and the ratio is as follows: 1. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Media Standards Trust director and campaign co-founder Martin Moore argued that the Leveson Inquiry “urgently needs to break open the Motorman files – not least because they might reveal how phone hacking really worked” in a post here. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Interestingly, the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Fulford LJ and Leggatt J) permitted a McKenzie Friend, Dr Michael Pelling, to make representations on his behalf. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
March 2011 It emerged during that case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police, that the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and its chairman paid £20,000 to lawyer Mark Lewis in settlement of his libel claim arising out of comments made by Baroness Buscombe. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
This arises, he claims, from his refusal to further support their applications relating to their immigration status and/or his refusal to co-operate with a scheme they had hatched to secure their own council flat elsewhere. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]