Search for: "LL v. Medical Protective Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
This one is on why some courts view pseudonymity as burdening the judicial process; I'll have more soon on reasons that support pseudonymity. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
This one is on why courts generally view pseudonymous litigation as denying valuable information to the public; I'll have more soon on other reasons against pseudonymity, as well as other reasons in favor. [* * *] [1.] [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
At trial, Holcombe’s lawyer cross-examined the co-defendants he also represented. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:48 pm
” The final case I’ll mention today is Kimberly Hartman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am
Co., 463 U. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
During oral argument, plaintiff's attorney confirmed that no statutory or regulatory violation had been or could be asserted, that plaintiff had only a medical negligence claim for the alleged treatment Burns received at Care One, and that he anticipated his experts may refer to a breach of statutes or regulations as evidence of the applicable standard of care. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
The next day, she went to the hospital, was diagnosed with a concussion, and was given intravenous medications for the pain. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:21 pm
[There are "Two Obstacles to (Merely) Chipping Away at Roe in Dobbs," he writes] On a few recent episodes of Divided Argument, co-host Dan Epps and I talked about the Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 19-1392Issues: (1) Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional; (2) whether the validity of a pre-viability law that protects women’s health, the dignity of unborn children and the integrity of the medical profession and society should be analyzed under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
, Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
And that’s what we’ll continue to do. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Reproductive rights protected by the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Suing such a speaker is a sure money pit: you have to pay your lawyer, and you know you'll never recover any of that expense, much less get compensated for your damaged reputation. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
§ 331(ll). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am
" The company paid for Roxy's food and medical care. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
E/C authorized these medical providers as primary care physicians: Port of Miami Medical Clinic/Irwin M. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
In Kestel v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
Van Dyke, 19-1272Issue: Whether, under the doctrine of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
She also became the co-author of a textbook on sex discrimination and the law – the first of its kind. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
Dunn (1821), and the States cannot serve as laboratories for social and economic experiment, see New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
