Search for: "Lagarde v. Lagarde"
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:50 am
In the first article, Paul Lagarde offers a survey of the 2012 succession regulation. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
According to the very handy, and indeed swiftly-posted, note on the MARQUES Class 46 blog by the lovely, learned and and indeed alliterative Laetitia Lagarde, the General Court upheld the OHIM Board of Appeal's refusal to register the word mark PAKI for various goods and services in Classes 6, 20, 37 and 39. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
In the world of European trade marks, the admirable Laetitia Lagarde has been carrying the Class 46 team on her shoulders this week with some very useful summaries of General Court decisions on Community trade mark issues, including those arising from the (non)similarity of E-PLEX and EPILEX, here. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
Please click here to read Laetitia Lagarde's report on the General Court's decision on the Marques Class 46 blog, where you can also see that the General Court had to decide on two figurative colour marks filed by Deutsche Bahn in two separate case, T-404/09 and T-405/09. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
The poll was inspired by the Kat's surprise at the ruling of the General Court in Case T-35/08 Codorniu Napa v OHIM - Bodegas Ontañon (ARTESA NAPA VALLEY), noted on Class 46 here by Laetitia Lagarde, that there was indeed a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In an interview at the Women at the Top conference in London, French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde spoke with the FT on video about her conference address (http://video.ft.com/v/677520169001/Lagarde-speaks-out-on-female-quotas). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:44 am
Courtesy of the Class 46 weblog, Laetitia Lagarde brings news of an ever-so-recent bit of General Court jurisprudence on the registration of colour pairings as Community trade marks. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Lagarde v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:55 am
As in the Lagardère case, the Netherlands Supreme Court decides that a limited circle of persons who can receive the signals from the satellite only if they use professional equipment cannot be regarded as part of the public. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:41 am
Hartley, The Integration Theory v Acquired Rights. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 4:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
