Search for: "Langford v. Langford"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
Rick Seller did not respond to Langford's question, and Langford asked, “Where did you spray? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Law):Shital Prakash Kharat, Effect of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 – Judicial Response, (February 6, 2017).Grant Robert Hooper, From the Magna Carta to Bentham to Modern Australian Judicial Review: Themes of Practicality and Spirituality, (Australian Institute of Administrative Law (AIAL) Forum, Vol. 84, pp. 22-44, 2016).From SSRN (LGBT Rights):Reva Siegel, Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Consensus, Conflict, and Constitutional Culture, (February 9, 2017).Susan Frelich Appleton,… [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:12 am
Eighth Circuit affirms.062852P.pdf 07/27/2007 Doyle Ollis, Jr. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
Langford, 314 F.3d 892, 895 (7th Cir. 2002), the exclusionary rule is bound some day to give way to them. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Randy Beck and John Langford argued for the revival of qui tam statutes as a check on executive officials. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
In Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 2428587 (D.S.C.) the Petitioner, Maritza Meszaros Reyes and the Respondent, Harry Lee Langford Jeffcoat were married and had three children, one of whom was over the age of 16. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm
From Weisenbach v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 pm
In August, the Michigan Supreme Court overturned McCormick v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:49 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Langford v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:54 am
In Pellegrino v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Schiro No. 18-0278 (Tex. 2019) (attorney fee award based on fee-shifting statute reversed and remanded for redetermination).Cognate Place Name ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Servs. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:13 pm
Langford, Tyler McAuley and Adam Ship [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Langford 14-983Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit properly applied the doubly deferential standard under federal due process and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Hooks v. [read post]
