Search for: "Lanham v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am
Use of analogous state-law limitations period for Lanham Act Section 43(a) claims was “unsatisfactory”; summary judgment order finding Bayer’s false association and false advertising claims time-barred was vacated. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:39 am
Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act could not extend to trademark infringement that occurred almost entirely outside the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court recently reviewed Matal, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:12 am
Control Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 1:51 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:47 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference the case of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
Then, in Iancu v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a $90 million damages award for trademark infringement based on infringement that occurred almost entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a $90 million damages award for trademark infringement based on infringement that occurred almost entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:36 pm
So held the United States Supreme Court on Monday, resoundingly, if a bit uneasily, in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:36 pm
So held the United States Supreme Court on Monday, resoundingly, if a bit uneasily, in Iancu v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm
Bayer Consumer Care AG 16-548 Issue: Whether Sections 14(3) and 43(a) of the Lanham Act allow a foreign business that has neither used nor registered its trademark in the United States to sue the owner of a U.S. trademark for conduct relating to the owner’s use of its U.S. mark. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
The Lanham Act seems to say no, and the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
The court emphasized both the prerogative of the United States to govern the worldwide conduct of its citizens and the language in the Lanham Act stating that it is intended to reach all commerce that Congress can regulate. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:26 am
Rapper 50 Cent’s Lanham Act claim against Cancun night club survives motion to dismiss Jackson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
