Search for: "Lanham v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 am
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
Nor has Opposer pleaded any facts to support how its use of the TORTRIX mark in Central and South America has resulted in the mark having a reputation among consumers in the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:12 am
Bunge North America, Inc., 2012 WL 5879271 (N.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:04 pm
For example, the District of Oregon jury’s recent award of $305 million in Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court has also held, in a 1940 unanimous opinion in Bacardi Corp. of America v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
” Stouffer declined, and National Geographic ended up airing the series in 2012 under the title “Untamed Americas” within the United States, and “Wild America” outside of the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Retrobrands USA LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
United States U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
In United Federation of Churches v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Benson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]