Search for: "Large v. Dick"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Dick Durbin in mid-March, would amend the Senate rules to allow senators to vote remotely using any technology certified as “reliable and secure” by the secretary of the Senate, sergeant-at-arms and director of the doorkeepers if the Senate majority and minority leaders or their designees jointly determine that “an extraordinary crisis of national extent exists in which it would be infeasible for Senators to cast their votes in person. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
Although lawmakers left Washington for weeks, they largely failed to settle on a means by which to hold hearings virtually, completing only one “paper” hearing before seeming to abandon the new format. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
A large number of law professors have published dozens and dozens of law review articles debating and discussing how and why the justices ruled the way they did in concluding that the EPA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in declining to decide whether greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
Again, the idea was to establish an off-shore haven for activity that would otherwise be illegal—a geographical safe harbor or TAZ well beyond the legislative safe harbors that largely accomplish the same purpose inside major economies like the United States in the name of protecting “intermediary liability” for the largest corporations in commercial history. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
I arrived to NFIB v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm
Its Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 4:36 am
” Briefly: Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
The Court ordered D.C. to issue Dick Heller a carry permit. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
” At The Nation, David Cole writes that “[i]f President Trump names another rigidly right-wing justice, the Court risks becoming an outlier, far more conservative than the country at large. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
How did running a large company shape your views on the proper size and role of government? [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
In today’s Leonard v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said it go [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
