Search for: "Large v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 28,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 4:43 pm
Second, I think Judge Perry made a rather large boo-boo… Third, read Sparkman v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:00 am
Wall Street Journal: States' Rift on Taxes Widens: Minnesota, Others Move to Raise Revenue as Cuts Remain Popular Elsewhere: Minnesota's move to raise $2.1 billion in new taxes, largely from the wealthy, to fund government programs puts it among a handful of states controlled by Democrats that are adopting more... [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Mont v United States, 587 U. [read post]
4 May 2009, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court issued its opinion this morning in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment applies when the government acquires large amounts of cell-phone location data. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
The case is Blankenship v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm
The post United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:03 am
The super-size soda ban, a program advocated by NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is not constitutional according to the unanimous opinion from a state appellate court in New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
From 1998 to 2004, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM or the Agency) conducted a large-scale land management planning process for federal fluid minerals development in Sierra and Otero Counties, where the Mesa is located. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In Mahoney v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:38 pm
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held, in Timbs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Davis’s application for a Large Family Child ... [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:31 am
Statewide Coal. of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:02 pm
On April 26, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:13 am
According to the state, that the surtax largely falls on out-of-state taxpayers is of no consequence under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:05 pm
American Electric Power, a suit filed by several state AGs against several large... [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The post State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 8:43 pm
Reform had largely stopped by 1973,... [read post]