Search for: "Latham v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:16 am
In Kelley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Holian are Partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Holian are Partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:48 am
In the recent opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
This post is based on a Latham memorandum by Mr. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
This post is based on a Latham memorandum by Mr. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
The case of FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
REILLY, GENERAL COUNSEL, NEW YORK STATE UNITED TEACHERS, LATHAM (JOSE L. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
REILLY, GENERAL COUNSEL, NEW YORK STATE UNITED TEACHERS, LATHAM (JOSE L. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am
Britt Latham Brian Irving In the following guest post, Britt K. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Jeffrey Clark (1:23-cv-03721) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Latham): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The petitions of the week are below the jump: United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:30 pm
Magistrate Judge and William V. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:44 pm
Latham, Demi S. [read post]