Search for: "Leathers v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2018, 1:39 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Patent & Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) will typically accept this statement without question. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
Homeopathic medicine was heralded upon its entry into the United States in 1835, primarily because –unlike traditional medicine of the time – it didn’t kill patients (like mercury tinctures) and wasn’t gross (like leaching). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
 The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) is the primary code-book that includes thousands of classifications  and a tariff rate (typically ad valorem). [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:23 am by Eugene Volokh
For instance, Georgia law — like the law of every other state — recognizes the tort of “intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am by Darcy Jalandoni
” Apple sought a petition of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court in October 2015. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:10 am by JD Hull
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am by Hanibal Goitom
Currently, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, India is the world’s biggest exporter of beef. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The judgment debtor acknowledges that it owns assets in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]