Search for: "Lee v. Howes" Results 41 - 60 of 2,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm by Rick Hasen
Jim Rutenberg and Steven Lee Myers lay it all out:… Continue reading The post Must-read NYT Deep Dive that Helps Explain SCOTUS Argument Monday in Murthy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
In those proceedings, the journalist working on the story had filed a witness statement concerning how they learned of the allegations from WFZ’s accusers. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Nonetheless, all of this evidence seems both relevant and probative of how this term was actually understood and used by the founding generation. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Lee, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, February 14, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Board of Directors, Board oversight, dei, Harvard, Management, SFFA, U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Lee, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, February 14, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Board of Directors, Board oversight, dei, Harvard, Management, SFFA, U.S. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]