Search for: "Lee v. State of Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Mark Lee Dickson and Right to Life East Texas lobbied to pass the ordinance stating that abortion is “an act of murder with malice aforethought. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
Lee Berger explains the Justice Department’s theory, which is not dissimilar to the Texas attorney general’s two-year-old claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
On the heels of the mandatory editorial transparency provisions in Florida and Texas’ social media censorship laws, the California legislature thought it could one-up those states by passing a law with at least 161 different disclosure requirements. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
John's) Edward Lee (Chicago-Kent) David S. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
O’Brien (1968) Texas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
With the exception of Texas, which was an independent Republic w [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Newest Charges Related to Alleged COVID-19 Fraud United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:44 pm
Immanuel cites only Texas state-court decisions in support of this argument. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:42 am
On Aug. 1, Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal (S.D. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:45 am
Ex parte Clinton Lee Young (2021 Tex. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
