Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 41 - 60
of 614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
We've gotten a lot more submissions to the Journal of Free Speech Law over the last month and a half than we had been getting before, and we've just accepted two of them (and are still considering a third): one of the accepted articles is on the history of Beauharnais v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:43 am
HDT Bio Corp v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
" Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 8:53 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The Fourth Circuit's recent decision in Washington Post v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 11:26 am
With Mark Lemley, available here. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
The prevailing wisdom is that federal agencies cannot generally disclose trade secrets and confidential information given to them in confidence by companies that they regulate or work with. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
In a different case involving Zoominfo, Rebecca Tushnet and Mark Lemley will be filing an amicus brief on this point. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Cahn v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Experiment asked about fairness between songwriters with prior relationship v. met through an ad. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
" In the same footnote, Nokia explains that one can deduce from the findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
Lemley described “this retreat from evidence” as “faith-based IP, both because adherents are taking the validity of the IP system on faith and because the rationale for doing so is a form of religious belief. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:23 am
Williamson v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
Most political leaders want to regulate the largest social media platforms to deal with the current misinformation and bias problems, but a veritable who’s who of internet law scholars (such as Jack Balkin, Daphne Keller, Mark Lemley and Ashutosh Bhagwat) have pointed out that politicians want contradictory things: more content removal and less content removal. [read post]
